Saturday, November 14, 2026
EOS installs a management system across your leadership team. A business coach works the one constraint holding you back. Here is what is published in New Zealand, who each suits, and five questions to choose.
Most strategic plans do not fail because the strategy is wrong. They fail because the plan is too big to run.
Published by Simple-Growth, a business coaching practice. Last updated 13 November 2026 (New Zealand time). Written for owners of established small and medium businesses in New Zealand and the United States.
ClearPoint Strategy, a strategic planning software company, analysed 20,582 strategic plans and 31.2 million records from its own platform (ClearPoint Strategy, released 20 November 2025). It found a sharp cliff: plans with fewer than 20 total goals, measures, projects and milestones succeeded 68% of the time. Plans with more than 60 succeeded just 8% of the time. Fewer than 10% of organisations completed even half of their strategic goals. ClearPoint does not name the countries, and does not define "success", so read this as a strong signal from one vendor's data, not a law.
If you have ever built a thorough, detailed, colour-coded strategic plan in January and found it gathering dust by November, this is not a discipline problem. It is a design problem.
For decades, business advice has pushed owners toward more detail, not less. Cover every department. List every risk. Map every contingency. A thin plan looks lazy. A thick one looks like leadership.
ClearPoint's report is not a survey of opinions. It is platform data tracking what strategic plans actually accomplished. And it points the opposite way from what most of us were taught: more content in the plan does not mean more gets done. It means less does.
The reason is simple arithmetic, not laziness. Every goal, measure, project or milestone added to a plan is a claim on somebody's attention. A 60-item plan is not three times harder to run than a 20-item plan. It is an order of magnitude harder, because every item is competing with every other item for the same scarce hours, the same scarce owner, the same scarce week.
This matters more for SME owners than for a large organisation. ClearPoint does not publish the size of the organisations in this dataset, so the numbers may not map neatly onto a 12-person business. But the logic holds: a 200-person company can spread a sprawling plan across a dozen departments. A 12-person business cannot. You are the department. Every line on that plan eventually lands on your own desk.
Here is what I use with Simple-Growth clients building a 90-day plan, the Rule of 20.
1. Name one real constraint. Not five priorities, the single thing most limiting growth right now: cash, customers, capacity, team, or you. Diagnose before you prescribe.
2. Choose three moves that would genuinely shift it. Not ten nice-to-haves. Three. If a move does not move the constraint, it does not make this quarter's list.
3. Give every move one named owner and one date. No "the team" as owner, a name. No "Q2" as a date, a week.
4. Keep the total under 20 items, including every sub-task you are tracking. If you are at 25, you do not need a better tracking tool. You need to cut five things.
5. Review weekly, not quarterly. A 20-item plan reviewed every week catches drift in days. A 60-item plan reviewed every quarter catches drift in months, by which time it is unrecoverable.
This is not a simplified version of real strategy. It is what real strategy looks like once you strip out everything that was never going to get done anyway.
"Kevin had a no-nonsense approach and tackled the issues head on. Accountability was the key."
— Ashley Berrysmith, Icehouse Coaching Programme
Most owners reading this already sense that smaller plans execute better. Here is why they still build the sprawling version anyway: it feels safer. A 60-item plan means you have thought of everything, so if something goes wrong, it was not because you missed it. A 20-item plan feels exposed, you are betting the quarter on three things actually working.
That is not really a planning problem. It is a confidence problem, and underneath it, an accountability problem. Without someone checking the plan weekly, not quarterly, not "when I remember", there is no cost to letting the list grow, because there is no moment where anyone asks why item 37 still is not done.
This is exactly where an outside coach earns their keep: not writing the plan for you, but being the person who makes keeping it at 20 items the accountable, uncomfortable, non-negotiable choice, every single week.
1. Pull up your current plan and count every goal, project, measure and milestone on it. Just count. Most owners are shocked at the real number.
2. If you are over 20, cut to your top three moves against your single biggest constraint. Everything else goes on a "later" list, not a "now" list.
3. Put one name and one date on each of those three. If you cannot name an owner, you do not have a plan item, you have a wish.
It is a planning limit: name one constraint, choose three moves that would shift it, give each move one owner and one date, and keep the whole plan, sub-tasks included, under 20 items.
Every item is a claim on the same owner's time and attention. ClearPoint Strategy's data shows plans with fewer than 20 items succeeded 68% of the time and plans with more than 60 just 8%. ClearPoint does not define success, so treat the figures as a signal.
Under 20 in total, counting goals, measures, projects and milestones. If you are at 25, cut five before you buy a better tracking tool.
Weekly. A short weekly review catches drift in days, while a quarterly review catches it in months, when it is much harder to recover.
ClearPoint does not publish the countries or organisation sizes in its dataset, so it may not map exactly. The reasoning, that every item competes for the same scarce owner time, applies even more strongly when the owner is the whole team.
Sources. ClearPoint Strategy, first strategic planning report: 20,582 plans analysed, 20 November 2025 (opened 13 November 2026). Testimonial: Ashley Berrysmith, Icehouse Coaching Programme feedback, verbatim.
Want a 90-day plan built on the Rule of 20, not the other kind?
Tuesday, November 03, 2026
An agency, a freelancer or doing it yourself with AI: who each suits, what one NZ agency publishes on cost, and six questions to ask before you pay anyone. Checked 4 November 2026.
Tuesday, November 03, 2026
Scaling Up gives a leadership team a four-decision platform. Coaching finds the one constraint to fix first. Here is who each suits, what is public on cost, and six questions to ask. Checked 3 November 2026.
Tuesday, November 03, 2026
Three self-paced programs at $97, $297 and $497. Here is the problem each one fixes, who it suits, who should skip it, and how to choose in five minutes. Checked 3 November 2026.
Monday, November 02, 2026
Strategic Coach, Tony Robbins Business Mastery or one-on-one coaching? A fair, source-linked guide for US owners, with a five-question test to match the format to your stage.
Monday, November 02, 2026
Research published by Adobe Acrobat in October 2026 shows 88% of UK business owners don't trust their own branding, even though 72% call it essential. Here's the gap, and the 3-step fix that closes it.
Monday, November 02, 2026
The New Zealand AI advisory pilot co-funds up to half of an AI plan for small businesses, capped at $15,000, and has been extended to mid-2027. What it is, what to check, and a practical first 30 days. Checked 2 November 2026.
Monday, November 02, 2026
Seven things you can check before you hire a business coach, and how ActionCOACH, Business Mentors NZ, EOS, Simple-Growth and The Icehouse compare on each. Method and bias disclosed. Checked 2 November 2026.
Monday, November 02, 2026
The demand is there. You aren't. Here's why your business can't grow past your own hours, and the simple method for designing one that can.
Monday, November 02, 2026
Flat out one month, silent the next, and every call is yours alone. Here's why the quiet season is exactly when an outside perspective pays for itself.
Monday, November 02, 2026
An invoice tips into overdue and somehow it's you, again, drafting the awkward follow-up. Here's why that's an ownership gap, not a cash problem, and the one-name fix that ends it.
Monday, November 02, 2026
You're closing deals and still going without pay. Here's why discounting to win the sale is costing you more than the sale is worth, and the fix.
Monday, November 02, 2026
You post, you boost, you hope. Here's the one-page system that tells you, every Monday, exactly which part of your marketing is earning its place.
Monday, November 02, 2026
Your sales report looks great. Your bank balance doesn't agree. Here's the strategic fix most growing SME owners miss, and how to find the handful of customers who actually pay you.
Monday, November 02, 2026
EOS gives a leadership team a shared system. Coaching finds the one constraint to fix first. Here is who each suits, what is public on cost, and six questions to ask. Checked 2 November 2026.
Monday, November 02, 2026
One third-party guide puts an EOS Implementer at $20,000 to $45,000 a year for two years. Here is what that buys, who it suits, and six questions to ask before you sign.