Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Which jobs should a US small business hand to AI first? Published US data, a five-check test and a 30-day plan to pick one job, track one number and keep the decisions that matter.

You missed dinner again. Not because the business needed you to — because you were replying to a lukewarm enquiry from the one Facebook group you haven't given up on yet, on top of the ad you boosted, the cold emails you sent, and the networking breakfast you can't skip in case it's the one that pays off.

If you want to know why chasing leads is eating your evenings, here's the honest answer: you're working every channel a little instead of one channel properly, and "a little everywhere" is the most expensive way to sell anything.

I used to say yes to every opportunity that landed in front of me. It took me years to learn that saying yes to everyone else's request is how you guarantee you never get to your own.

"Spray And Pray" Isn't A Strategy. It's A Habit Dressed Up As Effort.

The villain here is the belief that more channels equals more sales. It feels productive — you're doing something on five fronts — but five half-tested channels usually convert worse than one properly tested one, because none of them gets the repetition, the budget or the attention it needs to actually work.

Leave it unfixed and the cost isn't just a thin pipeline. It's every evening and weekend you've handed over to "just checking" a channel that was never going to be the one, while the people who matter most to you get whatever energy is left over.

The Bullseye Channel Framework: Test Wide, Then Go All-In On One

Gabriel Weinberg and Justin Mares built the Bullseye Channel Framework to answer one question for founders drowning in options: of every possible way to find customers, which one is actually worth your full attention? Here's the SME version:

  • Brainstorm every channel that could plausibly reach your customer — referral, content, ads, partnerships, events, cold outreach. Write down all of them, even the unlikely ones.
  • Rank each one honestly on cost, reach and how fast you'd see a result — not on which one you enjoy most.
  • Run a cheap, two-week test on your top three only. Not five. Three.
  • Go all-in on whichever one actually produced a real conversation, and quietly drop the rest.

I block my own diary until midday Monday and mid-morning Tuesday every week, no exceptions, because the channel work and the thinking work only happen if they're protected before the week fills up with everyone else's urgent requests.

"Kevin is an absolute powerhouse! He doubled our business's profits in the first month alone with lots more of his recommendations still to be rolled out."

— Curtis Hacon, Give A Sh!t

Why "Just In Case" Beats "On Purpose" Every Single Time

The real obstacle isn't knowing which channel to test. It's that staying active on five channels feels safer than committing to one, even when the data says one is clearly working better. Fear of missing out quietly overrides the evidence sitting right in front of you.

A second pair of eyes — someone who isn't emotionally attached to the networking breakfast you've been attending for three years — is usually what it takes to make the call and hold you to it. This isn't for you if you want to keep every option open forever. It's for owners ready to pick one channel on purpose and protect the hours that come back.

You don't need to work harder at lead generation. You need to work one channel properly instead of five channels badly — and get your Tuesday nights back in the process.

Key Takeaways

  • List every possible lead channel before judging any of them.
  • Test only your top three, cheaply, for two weeks — not all of them, not forever.
  • Commit fully to the one channel the test actually proves, and drop the rest.
  • Protect fixed hours in your week for this work, before the urgent fires take them.

If your evenings disappear chasing leads on five channels at once, that's the first thing we fix.