Thursday, November 12, 2026

You keep hearing "we went with the cheaper option." It feels like a price problem. It's actually a sameness problem — and a one-sentence fix, borrowed from first-principles thinking, can solve it before your next quote.

Most strategic plans do not fail because the strategy is wrong. They fail because the plan is too big to run.

Published by Simple-Growth, a business coaching practice. Last updated 13 November 2026 (New Zealand time). Written for owners of established small and medium businesses in New Zealand and the United States.

ClearPoint Strategy, a strategic planning software company, analysed 20,582 strategic plans and 31.2 million records from its own platform (ClearPoint Strategy, released 20 November 2025). It found a sharp cliff: plans with fewer than 20 total goals, measures, projects and milestones succeeded 68% of the time. Plans with more than 60 succeeded just 8% of the time. Fewer than 10% of organisations completed even half of their strategic goals. ClearPoint does not name the countries, and does not define "success", so read this as a strong signal from one vendor's data, not a law.

If you have ever built a thorough, detailed, colour-coded strategic plan in January and found it gathering dust by November, this is not a discipline problem. It is a design problem.

The Comprehensiveness Myth

For decades, business advice has pushed owners toward more detail, not less. Cover every department. List every risk. Map every contingency. A thin plan looks lazy. A thick one looks like leadership.

ClearPoint's report is not a survey of opinions. It is platform data tracking what strategic plans actually accomplished. And it points the opposite way from what most of us were taught: more content in the plan does not mean more gets done. It means less does.

The reason is simple arithmetic, not laziness. Every goal, measure, project or milestone added to a plan is a claim on somebody's attention. A 60-item plan is not three times harder to run than a 20-item plan. It is an order of magnitude harder, because every item is competing with every other item for the same scarce hours, the same scarce owner, the same scarce week.

This matters more for SME owners than for a large organisation. ClearPoint does not publish the size of the organisations in this dataset, so the numbers may not map neatly onto a 12-person business. But the logic holds: a 200-person company can spread a sprawling plan across a dozen departments. A 12-person business cannot. You are the department. Every line on that plan eventually lands on your own desk.

The Framework: The Rule of 20

Here is what I use with Simple-Growth clients building a 90-day plan, the Rule of 20.

1. Name one real constraint. Not five priorities, the single thing most limiting growth right now: cash, customers, capacity, team, or you. Diagnose before you prescribe.

2. Choose three moves that would genuinely shift it. Not ten nice-to-haves. Three. If a move does not move the constraint, it does not make this quarter's list.

3. Give every move one named owner and one date. No "the team" as owner, a name. No "Q2" as a date, a week.

4. Keep the total under 20 items, including every sub-task you are tracking. If you are at 25, you do not need a better tracking tool. You need to cut five things.

5. Review weekly, not quarterly. A 20-item plan reviewed every week catches drift in days. A 60-item plan reviewed every quarter catches drift in months, by which time it is unrecoverable.

This is not a simplified version of real strategy. It is what real strategy looks like once you strip out everything that was never going to get done anyway.

"Kevin had a no-nonsense approach and tackled the issues head on. Accountability was the key."

— Ashley Berrysmith, Icehouse Coaching Programme

Why Knowing This Still Is Not Enough

Most owners reading this already sense that smaller plans execute better. Here is why they still build the sprawling version anyway: it feels safer. A 60-item plan means you have thought of everything, so if something goes wrong, it was not because you missed it. A 20-item plan feels exposed, you are betting the quarter on three things actually working.

That is not really a planning problem. It is a confidence problem, and underneath it, an accountability problem. Without someone checking the plan weekly, not quarterly, not "when I remember", there is no cost to letting the list grow, because there is no moment where anyone asks why item 37 still is not done.

This is exactly where an outside coach earns their keep: not writing the plan for you, but being the person who makes keeping it at 20 items the accountable, uncomfortable, non-negotiable choice, every single week.

Three Things To Do Today

1. Pull up your current plan and count every goal, project, measure and milestone on it. Just count. Most owners are shocked at the real number.

2. If you are over 20, cut to your top three moves against your single biggest constraint. Everything else goes on a "later" list, not a "now" list.

3. Put one name and one date on each of those three. If you cannot name an owner, you do not have a plan item, you have a wish.

Key Takeaways

  • ClearPoint Strategy's platform data on 20,582 plans found plans under 20 items succeed 68% of the time, plans over 60 items just 8%
  • Fewer than 10% of organisations in that data complete even half of their strategic goals
  • More detail in a plan does not mean more gets done, it usually means less does
  • The Rule of 20: one constraint, three moves, one named owner and one date per move, under 20 items total
  • Review weekly, not quarterly, so drift gets caught in days, not months

Questions Owners Ask

What is the Rule of 20?

It is a planning limit: name one constraint, choose three moves that would shift it, give each move one owner and one date, and keep the whole plan, sub-tasks included, under 20 items.

Why do bigger strategic plans get less done?

Every item is a claim on the same owner's time and attention. ClearPoint Strategy's data shows plans with fewer than 20 items succeeded 68% of the time and plans with more than 60 just 8%. ClearPoint does not define success, so treat the figures as a signal.

How many items should a small business plan have?

Under 20 in total, counting goals, measures, projects and milestones. If you are at 25, cut five before you buy a better tracking tool.

How often should I review my plan?

Weekly. A short weekly review catches drift in days, while a quarterly review catches it in months, when it is much harder to recover.

Does the ClearPoint data apply to a business with fewer than 20 staff?

ClearPoint does not publish the countries or organisation sizes in its dataset, so it may not map exactly. The reasoning, that every item competes for the same scarce owner time, applies even more strongly when the owner is the whole team.

Sources. ClearPoint Strategy, first strategic planning report: 20,582 plans analysed, 20 November 2025 (opened 13 November 2026). Testimonial: Ashley Berrysmith, Icehouse Coaching Programme feedback, verbatim.

Want a 90-day plan built on the Rule of 20, not the other kind?

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Eleven hours worked, exhausted by 7pm — but how much of it actually moved the business forward? Here's the two-question Impact Filter.

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Most lost sales die in the first four minutes, not on price. Here's the four-question Discovery-First Framework that fixes it.

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

If your marketing stops the moment you stop paying for it, you're only funding half the job. Here's the audit that fixes the balance.

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Your 40-page strategy document isn't working because nobody can recall it. Here's the one-page, four-box plan that replaces it — and actually gets run.

Monday, September 21, 2026

You're tracking the wrong competitors. The business quietly stalling your growth is solving your customer's problem a completely different way — and it's not on your spreadsheet.

Monday, September 21, 2026

The cheapest audience in your market isn't strangers — it's your competitors' unhappy customers. Here's how to build a marketing campaign that speaks directly to them.

Monday, September 21, 2026

Winning deals teaches you what worked once. Losing deals, reviewed properly, reveals exactly where your sales process breaks — and keeps breaking until someone looks.

Monday, September 21, 2026

Big systems feel like progress but rarely fix productivity. The dozen small daily frictions nobody's bothered to remove are usually the real cost.

Monday, September 21, 2026

The cheapest coaching option is often the most expensive one once you count the year it fails to fix. Here's what a coaching engagement should actually deliver for the price.

Monday, September 21, 2026

The fastest way to grow isn't always a bigger ad budget — it's borrowing the trust a complementary business has already earned with your exact customer.

Monday, September 21, 2026

Dollar sales are up 0.8% but real unit demand fell 1.7% in the latest US retail data. If your revenue growth is just a price story, here's how to find out — and fix it.

Monday, September 21, 2026

Most business plans are fiction the moment they're printed. Here's the 3-step Resource Alignment Audit that reveals the strategy you're actually running — and how to close the gap before it costs you another quarter.

Monday, September 21, 2026

Most small business marketing budgets chase the customers who already love you. Category Entry Point Mapping shows why that caps your growth — and where the real customers are hiding.

Monday, September 21, 2026

More leads won't fix a slow sales pipeline. Learn the sales velocity formula SME owners rarely calculate — and the one lever that moves revenue faster than any lead-gen campaign.

Monday, September 21, 2026

"It's faster if I do it myself" is quietly capping your business's growth. Learn the $200-an-Hour Test to see what your delegation debt is really costing you.